"Take movies, music, poetry out of life & its gone!"

AGNEEPATH - Movie Review : A fine lengthy attempt but not a Remake at all with every single character of the Original remaining pure and untouched. (Review By Bobby Sing)

26 Jan, 2012 | Movie Reviews / 2012 Releases / Inspired Movies (Alphabetical) / A

As mentioned in my reviews earlier, A Remake is the easiest way of making your way into the history of cinema, which also gives you a readymade script to start working upon instantly. But after watching this recent version of one of the most stylish and cult movies of Indian Cinema (which got this status in the later years after being a flop initially), I reached a new conclusion about this latest trend in Bollywood.

Remaking a cult movie featuring one of the current heart-throbs of the Industry is undoubtedly the safest business projects for a production company. It not only shows that the company is hesitant in making films on some new ideas but it also loudly announces that the makers are now quite over-confident to think that they can surely do something better from the original in their new version. And these two conclusions are clearly proved by Dharma Production’s present remake of their own 1990 project in the following way:
1. Karan Malhotra’s AGNEEPATH is not at all a remake of Mukul S. Anand’s classic in a true manner. It takes too many liberties, makes too many deletions and adds too many insertions showing the over-confidence of its makers mentioned above. Many important characters of the original (like of Mithun, Madhavi, Tinnu Anand, Goga Kapoor and more) are taken off completely and many new are added, out of which only one works in a fine way, thankfully. But due to these hugely heavy manipulations, the real impact of the original gets lost and is visible only in parts. So, actually Karan’s current new age version just takes the basic idea plus some of its key characters from the 1990 film and then gives you a completely different product all together.
2. But even then, despite of making it so distinctively, Dharma Production still publicized it as a Remake of AGNEEPATH in order to get all the business benefits associated with the buzz as stated above. In fact this publicity stunt of making a remake of the hugely popular 1990 film will help them in two ways. Firstly it will bring in the Big Initial as essentially required for such mega project in its first weekend. Plus, since it is not exactly A Remake, it will re-install the memories of the past and would boost the demand of their own original 1990 project in the Satellite and Home Video market once again. So it’s a perfect two way profitable business plan being played here by the producers.
Coming to the review of the movie, it’s a pretty easy task if one writes about the film as a remake of Mukul. S. Anand’s AGNEEPATH of 1990. Because frankly, from that point of view it fails miserably since it lacks the 4 essential aspects of its original. Now Mukul’s AGNEEPATH had a powerful Vijay Dinanath Chauhan with his own impeccable style (followed by the youngsters even today), a strong mother with her truthful ideals, a lovable nurse-wife understanding her husband perfectly and an honest police officer who had a mutually respectful relationship with Vijay.
Unfortunately none of these four elements are there in Karan Malhotra’s official remake. There is very less emphasis given to the mother-son track, the nurse- wife gets converted into a beauty parlour owner degrading the character itself and the police officer never really feels like a strong official ever. But most importantly there is no Vijay Dinanath Chauhan here in this 2012 AGNEEPATH unexpectedly. And that’s where I have certain reservations with this so called remake of the cult classic.
Mukul S. Anand conceived Vijay Dinanath Chauhan as a larger than life persona, a macho man who had both mercy for the needy and terror for the culprits in his decorated eyes. But here in Karan Malhotra’s version we have a young well built Boy playing Vijay and not the Man, Vijay Dinanath Chauhan as in the original.
Mukul’s Vijay was a powerful Don, who also happened to be the Messiah for the poor and was loved by everyone immensely due to his good deeds. He worked with the BAD but had a heart thinking for the poor and humanity as a whole. But I honestly couldn’t understand this new Vijay and his ideals which are all confusing. At one end Karan’s Vijay living in a chawl, is doing many charity works and running his own vans for the cause. But on the other hand he has no objections and is very keen in dealing in Drugs which in fact is the key factor ruining our society, particularly the people staying in the same chawls in which he is living. Now what kind of ideology is that, remains out of my understanding completely. Its like at one point he supplies the youngsters the Drugs and at another point sends a charitable van in order to get them to the hospital.  
Secondly as per the theme, Mandwa (the village) is Vijay’s dream and so are the people living there to whom he wants to tell the truth about his father. So he will never like to ruin Mandwa or its innocent people, who are now working under the rule of Kancha. But contradicting this basic fact of the theme, Vijay in the climax, bombs the whole Mandwa in this new version of AGNEEPATH, visibly killing so many harmless people living in their miserable conditions. Now here the most interesting point is that in the original its Kancha who bombs the whole Mandwa with a remote control but here in the new version its Vijay who bombs the whole Mandwa……which looks very strange on the screen and quite weird too.
Hence this can’t be the VIJAY DINANATH CHAUHAN as portrayed by Mukul S. Anand in his 1990 original. So here is a different Vijay for the current generation who is less powerful, more cunning and a little confused too moving towards his mission of getting ‘Mandwa’ back for her mother.  
Thirdly there are so many things missing in this so called Remake. The famous opening scene at the Police Station where the young Vijay gets transformed into Vijay Dinanath Chauhan saying his ‘Poora Naam’ is not there. The raw feel and tense chaos in the scenes where Vijay and his people attack the slums where his rivals have taken his sister is not the same. And even the fabulous mud-fight shot innovatively back then in 1990 is also missing.
Yes, Mukul’s AGNEEPATH had many elements and scenes inspired from various sources but despite of that it had a typical Mukul stamp all over it which can be understood by the viewers who are well familiar with his other works. The man was a genius when it came to execution and Karan also takes many references straight from the master itself. But still, if you want to know about the film as a remake – then honestly it reaches nowhere close and walks on to a different path of its own with a pinch of painful over-confidence.
Conversely, if you watch it as a fresh project (which only has some similarities with the Cult Classic AGNEEPATH) then all is not lost here. As an individual project, without comparing it with the original, the film has its own merits and is watchable too with a few avoidable glitches.
In short, the latest project of Dharma Productions called AGNEEPATH is a well crafted, polished product which can be termed brilliant as far as production value, cinematography and action is concerned. So technically it’s a winner in one way but fails miserably when it comes to characterizations except the one called Rauf Lala.
In a very surprising manner, there is no Vijay Dinanath Chauhan leaving an impact on his audience in this new AGNEEPATH. The present version is more a Rauf Lala and Kancha’s AGNEEPATH than Vijay Dinanath Chauhan’s. Therefore, its not Hrithik Roshan but Rishi Kapoor and Sanjay Dutt, who successfully leave their solid mark in the end, against the general expectations. In other words, this is a more darker, rude and cunning remake where an innocent girl gets raped by the students in a village school, minor girls are being sold openly like slaves in the market and the hero who happens to be a masses man is eagerly doing drugs business and charity activities together.
The film starts off in a great style and impresses hugely in its first 30 minutes till the young boy grows up into Hrithik Roshan. The spell binding start raises your expectations to a great extent which sadly remain unfulfilled to a large extent. The whole film does have a grand look with magnificent colourful backdrops enhancing the overall impact of the people performing on the screen. But still the cliché subject of the script having the ages old plot of a child looking for his revenge through gang wars and conflicting family values doesn’t give you anything fresh to enjoy.
The sole winner of the film remains Rishi Kapoor as Rauf Lala, who shocks you with his well defined role done with convincing perfection. The "Lover boy of the 80s" surprises you once again (in a negative role) after more than four decades in the Industry and that’s indeed not an easy task to do for an actor at this age. Following him is Sanjay Dutt as Kancha who is able to spell terror on the screen with his deadly looks and body. But at the same time his character keeps hanging between a wicked don and a psycho maniac. Nevertheless due to these two veterans, the film has its Bad people making more impact on the audience than the Good ones.
Hrithik Roshan as Vijay becomes the victim of a confusion that what he has to do in order to differ from that Big Image of Vijay Dinanath Chauhan already there in the viewers minds. As a result, he ends up doing simply nothing extraordinary. Hrithik plays Vijay in his own style without any special gimmick or mannerism and remains too simple and straight throughout the film. And that’s the reason why the villains become the winner in this new AGNEEPATH. Though his performance remains perfect for the claps and whistles coming from his fans. But as far as the iconic character of Vijay Dinanth Chauhan goes, I was expecting something exceptional from the actor.
In the supporting cast, Priyanka Chopra is just there to be the leading lady in the credits and nothing else. Zarina Wahab is great in her limited scenes and Om Puri keeps struggling with his weak role. The rest of the cast performs well contributing to the overall feel of the film but no once stands out. Like the original, the remake also gets only few good songs including a forced one “Chikni Chameli” which again is a rehashed version of a Marathi track. Katrina Kaif works hard on his fast body movements in the song but fails to give the required face expressions essentially needed in such kind of raunchy track. Apart from this item number Ajay-Atul deliver a good emotional song "Abhi Mujh Mein Kahin" and a powerful Ganpati song having a pumping rhythm and energy. But they actually excel in their Background Score (more than the Soundtrack) which is simply great supporting its various sequences perfectly.
In all Karan Malhotra’s AGNEEPATH misses the bulls eye mainly due to its second half which goes beyond the required length becoming exhaustive. Though shot brilliantly, the climax takes too much time and that too when the viewer already knows that what is going to happen next. Moreover due to the new “Tree-Hanging” insertion in the script the original meaning of the word “AGNEEPATH” (The path of Fire) is no-where visible in this remake whereas in the original it was a visual Agneepath on the screen for Amitabh to walk on in order to kill Kancha.
In the end, I would only like to say that Karan Malhotra and Karan Johar’s new age AGNEEPATH is no doubt a well executed film in technical terms but talking about the content, its really not a film about Vijay Dinanath Chauhan we had seen in the past (certainly not a dancing Vijay for sure). It’s a remake just for the name-sake which actually leaves every single character of the Original, pure and untouched. So you can surely watch it but for Rauf Lala alone and not for Vijay Dinanath Chauhan. 
Ratings : 3 / 5 (Including 1 for its superb production values, execution and cinematography)

Tags : Agneepath Review by Bobby Sing, Agneepath Remake by Karan, Agneepath Film Review by Bobby Sing, Hindi Films Reviews By Bobby Sing at bobbytalkscinema.com, Bollywood Movies Reviews at bobbytalkscinema.com, Bobby Sing Bollywood Reviews, New Bollywood Movies Reviews, New Bollywood Movies Released, New Hindi Films Reviews, New Hindi Movies Reviews, New Hindi Movies Released, New Bollywood Reviews, Bobby Talks Cinema Review, Reviews By Bobby Sing, New Hindi Films Reviews
26 Jan 2012 / Comments ( 12 )

Wonderfully written.

Bobby Sing

Thanks DJB and Keep Visiting.

Vinay Ved

Some how I had a hunch about Rishi Kapoor ji\'s performance.....and you mentioned it as per my expectations........rest I knew will not be at the mark at all for I expect lease from Karan Johar who relies heavily on SRK and Melodramatic Family oriented movies to walk his career path. I appreciate your remarkable observation skills and second your views as most honest reviews as such. Great Bobby .....great passionate job done.

Bobby Sing

Thanks a lot Vinay for understanding and appreciating my honest views here.

If Indian viewers do not mind praising a Don who does Drugs business at one hand and Charity on the other then its indeed great on their part and reveals the secret that why multinationals are so keen on coming to India.

Coz here its too easy to fool the people by selling them a Aloo Chaat which doesnt have any Aloo in it.

You have hit the nail on its head as per the film review is concerened.
One just starts to realize all that when one reads your review.
Keep the great work going.

Bobby Sing

Thanks a lot Phalguni for approving and appreciating the viewpoint here.
I would try my best to continue working for my passion so do keep visiting and writing in.

Jay Shah

This new \'Agneepath\', as you say, has little to do with the beloved \'Agneepath\' from 1990 and whilst it is a well produced, slick film with all the modern technical prowess audiences now expect, the film leaves me cold. I hated the wishy-washy boy/man Vijay whose morality needs a real check-up. But then perhaps he is an accurate reflection of our ideals as a society today - don\'t worry about doing bad so long as you do a little good. No wonder the villains of the piece are more memorable - they are true to their immorality and vices!

This film was no remake but rather a cash-in on the cult prowess of an old favourite that was years ahead of it\'s time when it was released which is why it was not a huge hit when first released but attained its true status as audiences finally caught up. Your assessment of why the new film was called \'Agneepath\' is spot on!

I just hope that film-makers will have the courage to try new ideas. \'Kahaani\' by comparison to the new \'Agneepath\' was a breath of fresh air.

On another note - I appreciate your reviews as they are indeed from a true cineaste!

Bobby Sing

Thanks a lot Jay for appreciating my sincere efforts here and you are very much right in your observations regarding AGNEEPATH.
It was a weak film as far as subject goes and just played with the audience through its misleading title.

Do Keep Visiting and Writing In,

Bhowmik Haria
I can\'t believe you didn\'t appreciate the soundtrack of this movie! Abhi Mujh Mein Kahin has to be the best song of 2012. Such lyrics and such rendition is hard to find. Also Saiyaan is highly impressive. Please listen to the songs rather than watching it. Ajay Atul truly deserved all the awards for this OST. Glad they won the Mirchi Awards.
Bobby Sing

Hi Bhowmk Haria,

It seems that you just missed the para talking about the music of the film in the review. However admittedly I did miss out mentioning the track “Abhi Mujh Mein” which has been duly added now in the review as in the excerpt given below :

“Like the original, the remake also gets only few good songs including a forced one “Chikni Chameli” which again is a rehashed version of a Marathi track. Katrina Kaif works hard on his fast body movements in the song but fails to give the required face expressions essentially needed in such kind of raunchy track. Apart from this item number Ajay-Atul deliver a good emotional song "Abhi Mujh Mein Kahin" and a powerful Ganpati song having a pumping rhythm and energy. But they actually excel in their Background Score (more than the Soundtrack) which is simply great supporting its various sequences perfectly.”

Further, since the song was indeed better than many other love songs last year so you would be glad to know that it was also duly awarded the much deserved appreciation in my 2012 awards list which can be seen in the post at the following link:

BTC's Excellence in Hindi Cinema Awards for 2012.

So with thanks for pointing out the miss, I am sure you would love finding the song in the above mentioned list as desired.


Amit Joshi

If Indian viewers do not mind praising a Don who does Drugs business at one hand and Charity on the other then its indeed great on their part and reveals the secret that why multinationals are so keen on coming to India.

By reading your lines I just remember that in LAGE RAHO MUNNABHAI same things goes with Munna, he is a don who vacates house as per order of Lucky Singh but when it comes to his own love, he stops Lucky & takes a non violence path .........but audience don\'t realize that till the same munna was doing wrong thing... .........why ? can you answer........In the same manner in MBBS also he breaks people\'s bone at one hand but when he comes to medical college he shows sympathies with patients.........Can you please explain IS only INDIAN Audiance accept these kind of characters ? or in West also they are ready to take these loopholes.

Bobby Sing

Dear Amit Joshi,
If you can recall then there is a western folk lore or a legend known as ROBIN HOOD, which was often used to describe the DON characters in our earlier films in the past. And the reference was given as that DON or the person invovled in illegal practices used to help the poor at night or in the time of need.
In those days the most upgraded illegal activity used to be SMUGGLING of Gold, watches, antiques and other valuble things. Or on the other extreme there used to be bank looters, fake currency dealers or even Dacoits who used to loot the rich and then distribute in the poor. That was the concept of GOOD Dons who didnt do any social harm but attacked only a particular section ie the rich.

This was the concept in films till DRUGS came in and post the drugs too, there happened to be DONS who did all other things but not DRUGS as they happened to be the ROBIN HOOD DONS with a good heart, if you can relate too the concept explained above.

But the problem came in when with the changing times, the illegal trade got turned into drugs, girls suppliers, organ sellers, fake medicines and other ridiculous acts equally affecting the poor (or even more affecting the poor only)......Now from here onwards the imbalance came into the concept as now if the DON is engaged in these activities then he cannot be called GOOD DON at all, even if he does any amount of good by helping the poor in any way whatsoever. 

Now relating your point of LAGE RAHO MUNNABHAI.......................NO the same thing is not there in Munna Bhai and Raju Hirani has taken a very good care of that. There he is supposed to be a GOOD Don like in the earlier times where he is not involved in any disgusting act but is just the DON who vacates the houses, gets the work done through a good beating and thats it..

But when it comes to AGNEEPATH, the balance is out. Here the DON is shown selling girls and then becoming Messiah of the poor..........which simply cannot be justified by any angle and that is why I mentioned that in my review.

I hope you get to the depth of the Imbalance Point explained above and understand the difference in the earlier DONS and the new GOONS.

Leave A Comment
E-mail (will not be published)
Website (Optional)
Enter shown code